Note: This is a group project, and I am only responsible for a portion of the work. Citations have been removed to adjust for website rendering. The original PDF is at the end of this page.
ChatGPT’s potential for human-like communication is noteworthy, but the mental health implications of integrating a real human identity remain understudied. This research focuses on introducing an AvatarGPT, a human-like avatar, to the ChatGPT interface to delve into these effects. A between-subject study (N=10) was conducted to investigate users’ responses, evaluate, and compare the effectiveness of AvatarGPT and ChatGPT before and after a conversation using the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Results show that neither using an avatar (p≈0.39) nor conversing without the avatar (p≈0.11) significantly improved loneliness scores. Additionally, using the avatar did not enhance willingness to speak, as measured by increased word counts, or significantly reducing loneliness score in percentage (p≈0.59). We believe that with a larger participant pool and a longer experimental period, we would be able to observe a more significant increase in emotional change.